Quantum redactiones paginae "Disputatio:Mahometus Muradus Ildan" differant
This article should be deleted. I who call for delete is admin on no:, no:Bruker:Orland. This article is spread to several editions of wp as a extreme self-pr without any reasonable notability |
|||
Linea 8: | Linea 8: | ||
==Delete== |
==Delete== |
||
This article should be deleted. I who call for delete is admin on no:, [[:no:Bruker:Orland]]. This article is spread to several editions of wp as a extreme self-pr without any reasonable notability |
This article should be deleted. I who call for delete is admin on no:, [[:no:Bruker:Orland]]. This article is spread to several editions of wp as a extreme self-pr without any reasonable notability |
||
:Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Personally I'd like to wait and see what other wikis, with larger staffs, decide to do. --[[Usor:Iustinus|Iustinus]] 23:27, 23 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC) |
Emendatio ex 23:27, 23 Ianuarii 2007
Sorry for being sceptical, however, this article (and it's brothers and sisters in other Wikipedias) looks a bit strange to me. I have asked Usor:Cicero (see Disputatio Usoris:Cicero) to provide some extra information (ISBNs, etc.), if possible. --Rolandus 22:05, 19 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
Nomina
Hmmm, since Mehmet and Murat are both attested as Ottoman names, do we maybe want to Latinize to Maomethes Amorathes İldan? I also note that "Shakyamuni" is mentioned in Jesuit descriptions of Japan as Xaca. But I am unsure if that form, being a transcription 釈迦, should be used without reference to Japan. --Iustinus 19:01, 13 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
Delete
This article should be deleted. I who call for delete is admin on no:, no:Bruker:Orland. This article is spread to several editions of wp as a extreme self-pr without any reasonable notability
- Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Personally I'd like to wait and see what other wikis, with larger staffs, decide to do. --Iustinus 23:27, 23 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)