Disputatio Usoris:Wmdiem

E Vicipaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Salve!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!

--Rafaelgarcia 18:40, 3 Maii 2008 (UTC)

Salve, WMdiem,

interminatus, interminata, interminatum  ADJ   [XXXEO]    uncommon
forbidden w/threats; menaced/threatened; endless, infinite, unbound (Ecc

We prefer ciceronian latin here not ecclesiastical, and I don't think you mean forbidden by threats. Is it possible for you to provide an english or spanish translation of what you are trying to say, so that we can more intelligently help you with your latin? Vale,--Rafaelgarcia 00:29, 4 Maii 2008 (UTC)

What is this supposed to say? It is so mixed up that I can have absolutely no idea!:"Ratio quantitate, quid est accidens, potest sciri sine omnias alias formas, est quod quantitate est communis ad omnes substantias materiales, inquantum est in materia inaliquomodo ante primam formam, licet ut potentia propria, non actu."
The account by the quantity, what is an accident, can be known without all other forms (cases all wrong, forms??), it is what by the quantity is common towards all material substances, in as much it is in the material somehwo before the first form, it is permited that with all the power, not with the act? --Rafaelgarcia 04:24, 4 Maii 2008 (UTC)