Disputatio Usoris:Micke
Salve, Micke!
Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.
Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:
- Ops nexusque usoribus novis (
ca, 
de, 
en, 
es, 
ia, 
it, 
ru, 
ro, 
no, 
tl, 
eo) - De orthographia (
ca, en, 
es, 
tl) - Enchiridion interpretis (Anglice scriptum)
- Taberna
- Lexica Neolatina
- Lexica Latina interretialia
- Fontes nominum Latinorum ( ca)
- Fontes nominum geographicorum
- Index formularum
Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.
In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!
--Rafaelgarcia 15:52, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
Micke, es certus apponnere in ista pagina Micke tua nexum quod dicit "Friends of gays should not be allowed to edit articles"? Res scripta in ista pagina est impura et prava.
Micke, are you sure you want to put up in that page of yours Micke the link that says "Friends of gays should not be allowed to edit articles"? The stuff written on that page is immoral and just plain wrong. --Rafaelgarcia 15:52, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- If you read m:Friends of gays should not be allowed to edit articles (an essay on meta-wiki) you will see that the title is a joke and not offensive at all :-). I don't know what you consider immoral, but I just want to make it clear that I have nothing against homosexuals. The essay is about vandalism on wiki-sites. Micke 16:02, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- OK sorry, I suppose I didn't read that last line in the article, which declares that the preceeding is a joke. In retrospect, I don't see the humor in this kind of thing, but to each his own.--Rafaelgarcia 16:21, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- I suppose, however, that if they added restrictions on people in insane asylums, who seriously need therapy, or are otherwise delusional about being an eskimo king, I might start to find it funny.--Rafaelgarcia 16:24, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, Rafael, I had a moment with this, when I first saw it, too, but it is, after all, harmless, and makes a good point.--Ioscius (disp) 18:10, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- I suppose that we can't all have the same sense of humour, to each his own, as you say. Micke 18:36, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- De gustibus non disputandum as it were...--Ioscius (disp) 18:54, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- Veritas est. Micke 20:46, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- De gustibus non disputandum as it were...--Ioscius (disp) 18:54, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- I suppose that we can't all have the same sense of humour, to each his own, as you say. Micke 18:36, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, Rafael, I had a moment with this, when I first saw it, too, but it is, after all, harmless, and makes a good point.--Ioscius (disp) 18:10, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- I suppose, however, that if they added restrictions on people in insane asylums, who seriously need therapy, or are otherwise delusional about being an eskimo king, I might start to find it funny.--Rafaelgarcia 16:24, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)
- OK sorry, I suppose I didn't read that last line in the article, which declares that the preceeding is a joke. In retrospect, I don't see the humor in this kind of thing, but to each his own.--Rafaelgarcia 16:21, 16 Novembris 2007 (UTC)