Disputatio Usoris:Gesalbte

E Vicipaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Salve, Gesalbte!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!

--Xaverius 17:43, 4 Maii 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Gesalbte, I reverted your removal of content from the taberna. To remove user's comments is not allowed, except on your own talk and user page. See en:Wikipedia:Vandalism:"Blanking the posts of other users from talk pages other than your own, Wikipedia space, and other discussions, aside from removing internal spam, vandalism, etc., is generally considered vandalism. An obvious exception is moving posts to a proper place (e.g. protection requests to WP:RFPP). Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long talk page by creating an archive page and moving the text from the main talk page there. Note: The above rules do not apply to a user's own talk page. Editors are granted considerable latitude over editing their own userspace pages (including talk pages), and blanking one's own user talk page is specifically not prohibited. A policy of prohibiting users from removing warnings from their own talk pages was considered and rejected on the grounds that it would create more issues than it would solve. Since anonymous user talk pages may be shared by many users, removal of warnings is generally not appropriate."--Rafaelgarcia 18:31, 4 Maii 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
T T...it IS my comments....Gesalbte 19:15, 4 Maii 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well..The thing happens like this..I wrote a comments their about a translation problem..but I forgot conventum...lately I got the answer in neander's disputatio, and then I remove the former one because I think the articles in Taberna should be more constructive...Gesalbte 19:22, 4 Maii 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Latin http://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicipaedia:Porta_eruditionis