Disputatio Usoris:Bking2280

E Vicipaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ecce Vicipaedia:De orthographia--Rafaelgarcia 00:18, 4 Februarii 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Salve!

Gratus aut grata in Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob contributa tua gratias agimus speramusque te delectari posse et manere velle.

Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, a quibus hortamur te ut incipias:

Si plura de moribus et institutis Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, roges in nostra Taberna, vel roges unum ex magistratibus directe.

In paginis encyclopaedicis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento editis tuis nomen subscribere, litteris impressis --~~~~, quibus insertis nomen tuum et dies apparebit. Quamquam vero in paginis ipsis nisi lingua Latina uti non licet, in paginis disputationum qualibet lingua scribi solet. Quodsi quid interrogare velis, vel Taberna vel pagina disputationis mea tibi patebit. Ave! Spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!


Block[fontem recensere]

Salve, Bking2280. You have been blocked for removing content from pages, without giving any explanation. This is your second block, so you should be more careful next time. Your edits in taxus have been reverted--Xaverius 21:06, 6 Februarii 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How has he been removing content? What's going on with taxus anyway? Pantocrator 21:08, 6 Februarii 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Could be that it's a false article: a Taxus is a plant. The article might be on the right track if its lemma were Taxidea taxus. IacobusAmor 22:30, 6 Februarii 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, exactly. I've restored it at that title now. Like Pantocrator, I don't see where Bking has removed any content. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:22, 7 Februarii 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've removed the block for the present (I'm unable to contact Xavi immediately, and I apologise to him if I'm acting in ignorance). I can't find any content removed. I can only find the adding of content in obedience to three peremptory templates: Bking did the right thing, it seems to me.
Please bear in mind, Bking, that although we have no agreed rule as to which title to choose when an animal has both a common Latin and a scientific Latin name, the most active editors in this field prefer scientific names. So your new pages will not attract so many templates if you start out using the full scientific name as your title.
You could also, yourself, add the template {{Formula:Tiro}} at the top of each new page. This is a sign that you're not fully familiar with Latin or with Vicipaedia yet, and it invites other users to help with the page. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:17, 7 Februarii 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]