Disputatio Usoris:85.84.0.104

The "ethnic cleansing" problem In particular, the English Wikipedia has an "ethnic cleansing" problem. Subjects from countries where English is not the native or official language and utilize a non-Latin script alphabet are especially susceptible. When citing references, English-language sources are not required, but a lack thereof is enough of a shortcoming for an article to be marked for deletion. Sources in the topic's native language are often ignored, even in cases where knowledgeable users provide them; falling under the scrutiny of the eyes of the wrong group of users can easily lead to the systematic removal of invaluable articles. Actively trying to save these articles is a daunting task to undertake, but the effort on those who commit to handle this issue to the best of their ability is desperately needed.

If you think it's proper to accuse someone of "ethnic cleansing" without any proof, you should think twice. I'll leave aside the choice of words for a second, but have you considered checking whether what you say happens in the English Wikipedia actually happens here? Obviously not, because otherwise you would have realised that you can't find a single example of a page deleted merely because there was no source written in Latin.

Your other problem is that instead of doing what was requested, i.e. explain on the talk page your reasons for disputing the deletion proposal (in other words: give arguments for sufficient notability of the person concerned), you simply deleted the speedy deletion template without any explanation (because throwing a slur at another contributor doesn't count as an explanation).

Therefore, I would like to invite you to take the time until tomorrow to reconsider how you can contribute more constructively. Sigur (disputatio) 20:07, 8 Iulii 2021 (UTC)