Disputatio Usoris:64.191.50.30

de obstructione

Cave, usor ignote. Nunc Ioscius noster te obstruxit. Nescio rem, quam Andreas noster fecit, et non intellego hanc disputationem de litteris Graecorum. Sed certe Andreas permultas mutationes correctissimas fecit per annos quattuor. Errare humanum est, et si male is fecit, id eo dicamus, sed certe non tibi licet de usore nobis carissimo maledicere.--Xaverius 21:17, 26 Februarii 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Xavi, but this guy (or I think girl was assumed at some point) doesn't speak our language. Nor is there any reason to really explain this block, as this user knows precisely why he/she has been blocked.

Feel free to come back and blame me next time when your block expires, o usor anonyme!

--Ioscius^∞ 21:23, 26 Februarii 2010 (UTC)

Canvassing

Please do not post the same message to multiple talk pages. One talk page (usually the talk page of the article in question) is enough. In case of general questions, you may add a link to the relevant talk page to the Taberna, but adding a message to several user talk pages as well will not make the arguments and reasons you are about to bring forward any better. Please see en:Wikipedia:Canvassing. --UV 21:46, 26 Februarii 2010 (UTC)

Encyclopedia

Hi anon. Your contributions are valued. Please understand that we're trying to create an "encyclopedia". Thus we need to be super extra strict. Did you put sources? Since we're supposed to be an encyclopedia, every factoid must be investigated, sourced, discussed, etc. Don't be offended but it is hard to take seriously anyone who chooses to be anonymous. Pls realize that wikipedia is supervulnerable too and is actually vandalized regularly. So pls go through the right procedure. If you read the bottom of the edit box, it says "If you do not want your writing to be edited and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." . I hope you understand.--Jondel 05:33, 27 Februarii 2010 (UTC)

Hey Jondel, I appreciate your optimism and enthusiasm, but I wouldn't exactly say this user's contributions are valued, seeing as how she has and all her sock puppets have been banned on just about every wiki known to Adam (couldn't resist the joke). Also many of the "sources" this user have provided have been quackery and hogwash.

Furthermore what this user has done to plague Dr. Dalby, who was the one who made the altruistic mistake of correcting this user's cultish vandalism in the first place, is utterly inexcusable. In reality neither this user's contributions nor the style of contribution is valued. --Ioscius^∞ 06:33, 27 Februarii 2010 (UTC)