Disputatio Formulae:Elementa chemica

Format[fontem recensere]

First, let me congratulate you on your obvious patience in making this template! It is very well done. However, at the moment the list is quite hard to read. There are lots of numbers and letters very close together. Do you think it would be possible to make it easier? I thought perhaps make it look like a minature periodic table. I'll have a go on my sandbox and see, but I thought you'd like to know what I thought. Daniel (☎) 12:04, 6 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I propose something like the following. Let me know what you think.

Elementa chemica | Systema Periodicum

*

**

*

**

Daniel (☎) 16:53, 6 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The idea of that template was to give people a quick overview about the element pages we have or we don't have. Your suggestion looks nice but might optically collate with these chemical taxoboxes which some elements use, e. g. Aluminium. This could be an optical overkill. On the other hand my simple list will be nearly useless, as soon as we are using taxoboxes like this: en:Niobium. In

short: I am not very addicted to my template. --Roland2 17:22, 6 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I did not realise that we were going to be using the big taxoboxes/infoboxes (latine informarcae?). I agree that it would probably be quite redundant with these boxes. I've taken another look at yours and grown to quite like it. It is very simple, and allows people who know what they are looking for to quickly find it, and those who don't know so well to find it without taking too much time. Daniel (☎) 17:53, 6 Maii 2006 (UTC)[reply]