Disputatio Categoriae:Auctores Latini hodierni

    E Vicipaedia

    e pagina Disputatio Categoriae:Scriptores latini hodierni[fontem recensere]

    More Vicipaediano "Categoria:Scriptores Latini hodierni"? IacobusAmor 15:34, 5 Martii 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Recte mones, sed potius "Auctores ..." quia hoc verbo de linguis utimur, alio de civitatibus. Motum nunc proposui. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:44, 22 Martii 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    What is the distinction between "Auctores Neolatini" and "Auctores Latini hodierni", should we merge these two categories? Auctores Neolatini redirects to Auctores neolatini hodierni …? --UV 23:00, 22 Martii 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Good question. Pantocrator pointed out some time ago that "Neolatini" in the sense in which we use it here is against current usage elsewhere. In truth "Cat:Auctores Neolatini" should eventually be either deleted, or become a supercategory covering "... Renascentiae", "... recentiores" and "...hodierni". All those three are useful; "Neolatini" will perhaps not be useful.
    If the move that Iacobus and I have suggested is made, then ideally as a second step "Neolatini" should be removed from all pages on which it duplicates "hodierni". Then, as a third step, the remaining instances of "Neolatini" should be merged into "recentiores". That's my view, anyway.
    I hadn't noticed the redirect. In article space Auctores Neolatini should ideally be an article on its own, dealing with writers from about 1500 onwards. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:50, 23 Martii 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Steps one and two are done. Step three should better be done manually. --UV 22:43, 23 Martii 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Thanks very much for that, UV. I'll deal with the remaining pages. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:35, 24 Martii 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]