Disputatio:Novum Eboracum (urbs)

Imago

Maybe this would work? If someone wanted to incorperate it into the article. Alexanderr 01:28, 10 Februarii 2006 (UTC)

titulus

In my view urbs Novi Eboraci would be more correct. The Romans didn't say urbs Roma but urbs Romae (genitive) and so on. Alex1011 08:22, 18 Maii 2006 (UTC)

No, they said Urbs Roma. It's an appositon, like river Thames--2514 14:11, 18 Maii 2006 (UTC)

Is Eborac what the Romans called the city of York way back when? Also, why is the discussion here not in Latin!

Vide: Fontes nominum locorum --Alex1011 08:07, 22 Novembris 2006 (UTC)

Fontem habemus pro "Urbs Novum Eboracum"? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:57, 7 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)

Vide sigullum urbis: Civitas Novi Eboraci quasi nomen latinum officiale est. --W-j-s 20:48, 25 Octobris 2011 (UTC)

A, sed sigullum dicit "Sigullum Civitatis Novi Eboraci", "sigillum + gen." Ergo nomen veri similiter "civitas Novum Eboracum" legeri debet, sicut Latinitas poscit. Lesgles (disputatio) 19:38, 5 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)

pp.

Re "↑ Carolus Egger, Sermo Latinus Hodiernus: Acta Diurna (1986), pp. 19" + "↑ Allen J. Coombes, Dictionary of Plant Names, pp. 75" + "↑ Carolus Egger, Sermo Latinus Hodiernus: Acta Diurna (1986), pp. 50"—sed "pp." plus quam unam paginam indicat. IacobusAmor 01:53, 21 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)

Gratias ago. Mutantur nunc. Harrissimo 18:02, 21 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC).

De Insula nomine 'Staten'

Commenta de "Staten Insula" ad hanc paginam removi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:06, 20 Iunii 2011 (UTC)

Homines praeclari

At some point we will have to think hard about whom, if anyone, to include here, or else the section could get quite large (cf. en:List of people from New York City). Lesgles (disputatio) 19:26, 5 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)