Disputatio:Twitter

de versione[fontem recensere]

Puto twitting esse titiatio vel pipiatio, twitter autem titiatrum vel pipiatrum Talpa~ruwiki (disputatio) 13:40, 19 Ianuarii 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Twitting = vocabulum Anglicum e to twit = 'to subject to light ridicule or reproach; to make fun of as a fault' (dictionarium Merriam-Webster). Participium autem e to tweet deductum twittering est. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:52, 19 Ianuarii 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'To tweet' ut videtur = breveloqui. <<When Gallagher and his Vatican colleagues began translating papal tweets into Latin in early 2013, they had no idea how popular the brief missives would become. The feed gained more than 100,000 followers in its first six months and has since grown to 855,000. As Gallagher notes, even translating the medium’s name was a matter of some debate. “ ‘Twitter’ is associated with the sound of a bird, and in Latin there are many words for that, like pipiare or pipilare, and people who study the classics know some of them, because Catullus uses this kind of language in his poetry,” he says. “But it didn’t sound right; it didn’t have any weight to it.” They ultimately settled on breveloquens (“to speak briefly”), which references an expression from Cicero.>> Fons hic. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:48, 19 Ianuarii 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gratias maximas. Sed Pagina alicuius breviloquentis, ut hic dicitur, una pagina potest nominari, nescio quomodo situs totus ('paginae breviloquentiae'? 'brevilocutorium' idoneum videtur). Talpa~ruwiki (disputatio) 14:58, 19 Ianuarii 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Titulos paginarum de nominibus mercatoriis, lege protectis, vertere non solemus (vide Vicipaedia:De nominibus propriis#Societates). Si nexus intervicios perlegis, videbis alias Vicipaedias magna parte nomen Twitter retinere. Versionem seu explicationem Latinam nihilominus praebere oportet. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:24, 19 Ianuarii 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sic, nomen paginae mutare nolebam. Talpa~ruwiki (disputatio) 16:37, 19 Ianuarii 2018 (UTC)[reply]