Disputatio:Remanentia
Pagina huic coniuncta e conversione paginae “Remanence” sitūs en.wikipedia.org orta est.
Auctoribus illius paginae hic enumeratis gratias agimus.
Aquesta pàgina es basa en una traducció de „Remanence“ a en.wikipedia.org. Podeu trobar la llista d'editors aquí.
Die angegliederte Seite basiert ursprünglich auf einer Übersetzung von „Remanence“ aus en.wikipedia.org. Eine Liste der Autoren ist hier verfügbar.
The attached page originated as a translation from the page “Remanence” on the site en.wikipedia.org.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
La apuda paĝo origine baziĝas sur traduko de “Remanence” el en.wikipedia.org. Listo de la ĝentilaj artikolverkintoj haveblas ĉi tie.
Nemmata[fontem recensere]
I didn't see the point of inventing three lemmata: "remanentia" (a word that already exists in modern Latin) suffices, followed by a definition. If I'm wrong, please revert. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:37, 12 Martii 2018 (UTC)
- No problem. Of course remanentia itself is a back-formation, but it accommodates a glaring bit of jargon, so why not? IacobusAmor (disputatio) 13:42, 12 Martii 2018 (UTC)