Disputatio:Progressus durabilis

Lemma et definitio[fontem recensere]

"Devolutio durabilis est devolutio vel civilizatio quae praesentes populi opes naturales uteri pro iuribus populi futuri est cum minima pollutione."—Anglice videtur haec sententia significare "A lasting degeneration [spinoff, rolling down, falling] is a degeneration or a civilization that a people's present natural resources of a womb in favor of the rights of a future people is with the smallest defilement." IacobusAmor 17:15, 15 Novembris 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ita quidem! :–) Profecto multa corrigenda sunt, sed titulus et lemma quam citissime mutanda sunt, ne extravicipaedianis Latine callentibus ridiculi videamur. Fauste evenit quod fontem extravicipaedianum habemus huius termini aliquantulum arcani: progressus durabilis (Pekkanen & Pitkäranta). Itaque non esse videtur, quin titulum mutemur. Neander (disputatio) 15:29, 8 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Optime, emendationis gratias tibi ago.Jondel (disputatio) 02:30, 9 Ianuarii 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"... ut et ipsis posterisque ..."[fontem recensere]

Writing " et ... -que " to mean " et ... et " seemed odd to me. I happen to have Cassell's Latin Dictionary handy, and indeed I see there: " et ... -que: rare, but found in Cicero." Toddcs (disputatio) 23:54, 19 Octobris 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Both for themselves and for those who come later", emphasizing "both". Is that it? I think it's good (I'm glad if Cicero thought so too). Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:28, 20 Octobris 2023 (UTC)[reply]