Disputatio:Novum Eboracum (urbs)

E Vicipaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Imago[fontem recensere]

Seal of New York City.svg

Maybe this would work? If someone wanted to incorperate it into the article. Alexanderr 01:28, 10 Februarii 2006 (UTC)

titulus[fontem recensere]

In my view urbs Novi Eboraci would be more correct. The Romans didn't say urbs Roma but urbs Romae (genitive) and so on. Alex1011 08:22, 18 Maii 2006 (UTC)

No, they said Urbs Roma. It's an appositon, like river Thames--2514 14:11, 18 Maii 2006 (UTC)
Is Eborac what the Romans called the city of York way back when? Also, why is the discussion here not in Latin!
Vide: Fontes nominum locorum --Alex1011 08:07, 22 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
Fontem habemus pro "Urbs Novum Eboracum"? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:57, 7 Aprilis 2007 (UTC)
Vide sigullum urbis: Civitas Novi Eboraci quasi nomen latinum officiale est. --W-j-s 20:48, 25 Octobris 2011 (UTC)
A, sed sigullum dicit "Sigullum Civitatis Novi Eboraci", "sigillum + gen." Ergo nomen veri similiter "civitas Novum Eboracum" legeri debet, sicut Latinitas poscit. Lesgles (disputatio) 19:38, 5 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)

pp.[fontem recensere]

Re "↑ Carolus Egger, Sermo Latinus Hodiernus: Acta Diurna (1986), pp. 19" + "↑ Allen J. Coombes, Dictionary of Plant Names, pp. 75" + "↑ Carolus Egger, Sermo Latinus Hodiernus: Acta Diurna (1986), pp. 50"—sed "pp." plus quam unam paginam indicat. IacobusAmor 01:53, 21 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC)

Gratias ago. Mutantur nunc. Harrissimo 18:02, 21 Ianuarii 2008 (UTC).

De Insula nomine 'Staten'[fontem recensere]

Commenta de "Staten Insula" ad hanc paginam removi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:06, 20 Iunii 2011 (UTC)

Homines praeclari[fontem recensere]

At some point we will have to think hard about whom, if anyone, to include here, or else the section could get quite large (cf. en:List of people from New York City). Lesgles (disputatio) 19:26, 5 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)