Disputatio:Mauritius Macri
E primis sententiis removi ...[fontem recensere]
... haec verba cum notis quinque subiunctis: " dexterarum partium[1] [2] [3] [4] -aut mediae dexterae secundum aliorum sententiam[5] -". In prima sententia paginae satis longae oportet res certas inserere. Si mensuram qua a centro ideali factio politica distet nescimus, oportet de hac re in pagina de factione disserere! Atque si cum verbo "conservativa" aliqui dissentiunt, oportet et hoc verbum e prima sententia removere.
- ↑ https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/11/26/arge-n26.html
- ↑ http://www.lemonde.fr/ameriques/article/2015/11/23/en-argentine-le-liberal-mauricio-macri-remporte-l-election-presidentielle_4815218_3222.html
- ↑ http://www.lastampa.it/2015/10/26/esteri/boom-della-destra-in-argentina-pareggio-coi-peronisti-e-ballottaggio-a-sorpresa-da-favorita-Hc5GDIoOurVy9XAusg57WN/pagina.html
- ↑ https://amerika21.de/2015/11/136903/macri-ernennt-kabinett http://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2015-11/argentinien-wahl-mauricio-macri-praesident-konservativer
- ↑ http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/22/argentina-election-exit-polls-buenos-aires-mauricio-macri
Necesse erit nexus, in notis subiunctis enumeratos, melius explicare, sicut iam feci ego in ea nota quae primum locum habet. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:50, 9 Ianuarii 2016 (UTC)