Disputatio:Lacus Maracaibo
Pagina huic coniuncta e conversione paginae “Lake Maracaibo” sitūs en.wikipedia.org orta est.
Auctoribus illius paginae hic enumeratis gratias agimus.
Aquesta pàgina es basa en una traducció de „Lake Maracaibo“ a en.wikipedia.org. Podeu trobar la llista d'editors aquí.
Die angegliederte Seite basiert ursprünglich auf einer Übersetzung von „Lake Maracaibo“ aus en.wikipedia.org. Eine Liste der Autoren ist hier verfügbar.
The attached page originated as a translation from the page “Lake Maracaibo” on the site en.wikipedia.org.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
La apuda paĝo origine baziĝas sur traduko de “Lake Maracaibo” el en.wikipedia.org. Listo de la ĝentilaj artikolverkintoj haveblas ĉi tie.
Too many footnotes[fontem recensere]
I can't imagine why we need any footnotes, let alone fourteen, to support the bland and uncontroversial claims in the first two sentences. Unless any of them belong in a bibliography or external links section, they should be deleted, shouldn't they? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:54, 16 Iunii 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't have time to convert them to a bibliography (which I prefer); they came straight from the English wiki. ¶ However, they do have a certain usefulness in the 10K competition. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 14:35, 16 Iunii 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I understood that, hence my hesitation. OK, one of us no doubt will undertake some of that conversion. No problem Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:39, 16 Iunii 2017 (UTC)