Disputatio Usoris:Gualterius de Reptilibus/Index nominum Latine redditorum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia

Titulus[fontem recensere]

Should it be Index praenominum Latine redditorum? These are not nomina but praenomina (first names, Christian names), I think. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:09, 5 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The A and B sections of the list now include an increasing number of Italian surnames, so my suggestion above may not be relevant. But what's the purpose of the list? It can surely never include all surnames, not even all Italian ones. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:06, 6 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Assentio Andreae. Cognomina latinizare non solemus, nisi homo ipse suo aevo nomen suum latinizabat. Nullo terrarum indice autem omnia cognomina latinizata contineri possent. Suadeo enim ut moveatur commentatio ad Index praenominum Latine redditorum sive clarius Glossarium praenominum linguiis popularibus cum versione Latina, mutandis mutatis in ipsa commentatione.--Ceylon 07:41, 13 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hunc indicem feci ut si aliquis (praesertim Italus, quia cognomina Italica copiose latinizata sunt) vellet praenomen et cognomen suum videre ut Latine reddatur, posset. Index praenominum iam extat!
At Index praenominum abs hocce indice maxime differt eo, quod non colligit nomina linguarum popularium, sed Latini tantum sermonis. Si indicem vis constituere cognominum Italicorum latinizatorum, melius esse videtur si novam paginam creavisses. Hic autem index perutilis est eis, qui in paginis Vicipaediae scribendis versionem quaerunt praenominum popularium sermonum, quae necessaria sunt ut regulae Vicipaediae obtemperetur.--Ceylon 15:18, 13 Aprilis 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Errores[fontem recensere]

Removi

  • Aveni(a) (Italice) = Avenius (exempli gratia Rufus Festus Avenius)
quia Avenius non reperio; nomen huius auctoris est Rufus Festus Avienus
quia error Vicipaediae olim erat conversio nominis Americani Britney in Britannia, et quia Brittany ut nomen hominis non reperio

Contribuenda[fontem recensere]

I'm not sure. The problem with this page, if I'm not mistaken, is that it was created almost wholly by Usor:Gualterius de Reptilibus; he had very definite ideas about names, and these are the names that mattered to him. Some are forenames, some are surnames. The Latin equivalents are certified only by him: some don't agree with our rules. The forenames are probably mostly OK; the surnames (I suspect) are unverifiable and useless to us. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:26, 6 Decembris 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then I do not see the point of this page. It covers largely the index praenominum, and if the surnames which appear are probably wrong, then it is misleading. Should the contribuenda be turned into a delenda then?--Xaverius 18:38, 6 Decembris 2009 (UTC)[reply]
He hasn't been back for a while. But rather than delete it we might move it into his userspace? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 21:02, 6 Decembris 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Usor:Gualterius de Reptilibus/Index nominum Latine redditorum ?--Xaverius 21:45, 6 Decembris 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Movi. Notandum est (Usor:Ceylon supra dixit) praenomina huius indicis utilia esse; possumus aut glossarium novum multilingue praenominum e hac pagina creare, aut praenomina in paginam "Index praenominum" addere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:25, 7 Decembris 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming[fontem recensere]

Since this page is under attack by spammers, and since Gualterius no longer visits, I am deleting and protecting it. Naturally any administrator can restore it should Gualterius wish to use it again.

Hac pagina a spammatoribus obsessa, Gualterio his temporibus apud nos non visitante, paginam deleo et protego. Quisque magistratus recreare potest si Gualterius id petit. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:14, 1 Iulii 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Receptum de "https://la.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disputatio_Usoris:Gualterius_de_Reptilibus/Index_nominum_Latine_redditorum&oldid=3262651"