Disputatio:Iarchas
Textus ex Hofmanno mutuatus[fontem recensere]
Haec mihi videtur omnia a Lexico Universali Hofmanni dempta: vide s:la:LexUniv:Iarchas. Licet Hofmanno uti, si res utiles praebet, sed (a) debemus fontes nostros aperte citare, (b) si ad verbum citamus, debemus id punctis " " citare. Paginam igitur rescribendam suadeo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:13, 22 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
- Optime! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:34, 22 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
- You caught me in the act! I was in the process of going through Hofmann to see what might be useful, but I decided to stick with the basics; the rest seems to be musings about connections between authors, and his story about the rings seems to be different from the one in the link I gave to Philostratus. I tried to include both; maybe someone can sort it out better. Lesgles (disputatio) 15:40, 22 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to be hasty -- the topic interested me. eep in mind, if starting a page with some text that isn't in proper form yet, you can add the tag {{In progressu}} ... or you can forget to do so, of course, as I sometimes do. There's no problem at all :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:10, 22 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
- Good to know: I had forgotten about that tag. Lesgles (disputatio) 16:14, 22 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
- I meant to add -- that Hofmann article is a nice find: I wouldn't have expected him to have an article at all, let alone one with so many referecnes. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:43, 22 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
- Good to know: I had forgotten about that tag. Lesgles (disputatio) 16:14, 22 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry to be hasty -- the topic interested me. eep in mind, if starting a page with some text that isn't in proper form yet, you can add the tag {{In progressu}} ... or you can forget to do so, of course, as I sometimes do. There's no problem at all :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:10, 22 Octobris 2013 (UTC)
- You caught me in the act! I was in the process of going through Hofmann to see what might be useful, but I decided to stick with the basics; the rest seems to be musings about connections between authors, and his story about the rings seems to be different from the one in the link I gave to Philostratus. I tried to include both; maybe someone can sort it out better. Lesgles (disputatio) 15:40, 22 Octobris 2013 (UTC)