Disputatio:Fekete Pákó
Nota[fontem recensere]
Nota devia est. Error CDIV apparet. SiGe91 12:34, 12 IX 2014 (UTC)
- Auctor celeriter errorem notavit reparavitque. SiGe91 12:40, 12 IX 2014 (UTC)
De appelatione[fontem recensere]
Pronomina demonstrativa utuntur non est necesse in appelationem de cantu. SiGe91 13:33, 12 IX 2014 (UTC)
Pagina delenda?[fontem recensere]
Nobis necesse erit fontes fideles independentesque citare de hoc homine et de nomine "Lapite Oludaious".
The page will be deleted unless we have reliable, independent sources about this person and about the name "Lapite Oludaious". Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:37, 12 Septembris 2014 (UTC)
Only hungarian sources[fontem recensere]
Sorry but there is nothing but hungarian sources about this musician. (But the sole existence of the hungarian wiki should be enough I guess)
- No, our rule is that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Independent Hungarian sources are fine, if accurately cited: reliable online sources are best, naturally. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:41, 12 Septembris 2014 (UTC)
- OK, the page is just about passable, though it wants more text. I guess someone must have thought that "Oludaious" is a possible Latin form. It isn't :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:40, 29 Septembris 2014 (UTC)