Disputatio:Colonizatio Europaea Americarum

non stipula[fontem recensere]

Xavi, in

"Paginis minimis Vicipaedicis necesse sunt:

Titulus, in lemmate repetitus, a citatione sive nexu corroboratus

Definitio lemmatis

which part of "necesse" and "Definitio lemmatis" don't you understand? ;) IacobusAmor 15:34, 3 Maii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was working on it, you were simply too fast!--Xave ri us 15:36, 3 Maii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Call me Mr. Speedy! IacobusAmor 15:37, 3 Maii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Definitio lemmatis[fontem recensere]

Somehow, though, this is unsatisfying:

Colonisatio^? Europaea Americarum est spatium temporis inter annum 1492 et saeculum XIX, in quo nationes Europaeae terras in Americano continente ceperunt, rexerunt et populaverunt.

The European colonizing of the Americas is the period between the year 1492 and the nineteenth century, in which European tribes seized, marked out the boundaries of, and plundered lands on the American continent.

For that matter, the exordium of the article at :en: isn't all that encouraging either! IacobusAmor 15:44, 3 Maii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fortasse civitates pro nationes, regnaverunt pro rexerunt atque incolaverunt pro populaverunt?--Xave ri us 16:28, 3 Maii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Colonisatio??[fontem recensere]

I believe we've standardized on using 'z' in these words, haven't we? I see 'z' on many other pages, and I believe I was corrected when I used 's'. Of course, 's' is most common in 18th-century Latin, but 'z' I believe is the only form supportable classically. Pantocrator 12:52, 4 Maii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ita vero. --Gabriel Svoboda 13:08, 4 Maii 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peccavi. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 13:17, 4 Maii 2010 (UTC)[reply]