Disputatio:Accumulatrum (energia)
Pagina huic coniuncta e conversione paginae “Accumulator (energy)” sitūs en.wikipedia.org orta est.
Origo huius versionis fuit recensio no. 986899695. Auctoribus illius paginae hic enumeratis gratias agimus.
Aquesta pàgina es basa en una traducció de „Accumulator (energy)“ a en.wikipedia.org, edició 986899695. Podeu trobar la llista d'editors aquí.
Die angegliederte Seite basiert ursprünglich auf einer Übersetzung von „Accumulator (energy)“ aus en.wikipedia.org, Versionsnummer 986899695. Eine Liste der Autoren ist hier verfügbar.
The attached page originated as a translation from the page “Accumulator (energy)” on the site en.wikipedia.org.
It was taken from edit no. 986899695. We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
It was taken from edit no. 986899695. We are grateful to the authors of that page as listed here.
La apuda paĝo origine baziĝas sur traduko de “Accumulator (energy)” el en.wikipedia.org, Versionsnummer 986899695. Listo de la ĝentilaj artikolverkintoj haveblas ĉi tie.
De lemmate[fontem recensere]
De: {{scholium|inspicitur=latinitas|“onerabile” est redundans (“onerare” ≈ “cumulare”, ergo “accumulatrum onerabile” poene est “cumulatrum cumulabile”)|'''onerabile'''{{dubsig}}. <!--RECHARGEABLE (necessaria lemmatis pars)-->}}
- Ita, sed hic commentarius (en: "rechargeable battery") a commentario de accumulatro (en: "battery (electric)" distinguendus est. Onerabile hic '(re)chargeable' significare conatur. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 21:45, 19 Aprilis 2023 (UTC)
- I have changed the interwiki link (before it was actually confusing). So now it is not limited to electric energy (although it can be electric too). I believe that if we model this page on the English Wikipedia we will solve all our problems. --Grufo (disputatio) 22:45, 19 Aprilis 2023 (UTC)