Page contents not supported in other languages.
E Vicipaedia

I have two problems. 1. Air isn't a type of technology! Surely this should have its own section somewhere in the science category. 2. Should we be using these accents for article names? I know it can easily be redirected to, but should our articles be Aëroplanum and Aëroportus? --Harrissimo 16:54, 12 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categoria:Chemia and Categoria:Elementa chemica would be more appropriate. As to what to do about the umlauted es with diaereses, I wonder too.--Rafaelgarcia 17:25, 12 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Umlaut refers to a specific sound. These are diaereses.
I would move this to Aer, and put the diaeresis in the lemma.--Ioscius (disp) 19:27, 12 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Right sorry. Mea cupla on the dieresis. I think Ioscius suggestion is best. Unaccented titles make it easier to search since you don't have to type the accents in the search window.--Rafaelgarcia 19:32, 12 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Habemus movendam. --Harrissimo 19:55, 12 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I don't agree at all. Since this is an ecyclopedia, it is necessary that we write the article's right title, and everyone editing here must do the same. It is true that it would be easier to write the diaeresisless title, but it would mean that we could start writing the other articles' titles in a more simplified way. No, I think it is better to write properly the title (with the diaeresis), and to make a simpler redirection.--Le K-li 21:02, 12 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A discussion has been started at Vicipaedia:Taberna#Umlauted e's with diaeresis-- Do we have a policy?. --Harrissimo 21:22, 12 Septembris 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nitrous oxide[fontem recensere]

Hoc gas indice mea omisi, ut fontem Latine non inueni. Linguae Romanicae et Anglicae inter se discrepant, et ideo non utitur. Quum fons talis repperitur, addas. Pantocrator 00:41, 28 Aprilis 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oxidum nitrosum: [1]. Burzuchius (disputatio) 20:09, 12 Maii 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]