Disputatio:Musica

Musica fuit pagina mensis Iunii 2023.

This article has a incorrect structure. It must begin: Musica .........est.........--Daniel bg 10:50, 3 Ianuarii 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Musica est ars. . . ." What could be correcter than that?! IacobusAmor 12:27, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was fixed in March 2006. The bad structure was before then.--Rafaelgarcia 22:04, 20 Octobris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imagines[fontem recensere]

The two depicted Western composers are Liszt & Wagner: not at all a NPOV. Someday, we must work on this. IacobusAmor 12:27, 11 Iunii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cantus ... Musica ...[fontem recensere]

Currently Cantus redirects to Musica. This doesn't seem right. In addition, under "Vide etiam" there is Cantus, which in effect redirects to itself. If a separate article for Cantus ("singing") were written, that would of course solve both problems. LionhardusCiampa 16:28, 20 Octobris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I started a separate article. --UV 21:20, 20 Octobris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haec removi ...[fontem recensere]

... e bibliographia. Sed certe oportet bibliographiam multilinguem praebere si possumus, et, si privilegium Angloamericanis datum reperimus, tale privilegium deminuere usque ad aequalitatem! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:04, 12 Maii 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Una ayuda para subdesarollados que quizás no lo comprendrán: conocimiento es algo que solo existe en inglés. Lo mejor de lo que fué escrito sobre música? Todo en inglés -- óbvio. Algo escrito en alguna otra lengua que sea digno de mención? No, nada de nada! Welcome to Wikipedia! Now in Latin!)