Disputatio Vicipaediae:Petitio magistratus

"MediaWiki redere possunt" - (reddere?, legere?) ??? "certissimi, humanissimi, patientissimi". praefero: "certi, humani, patientes". satis erit, si quis certus, humanus, patiens sit. Sergius 09:07 aug 26, 2004 (UTC)

Quod attinet ad superlativos, non magni mea refert, tamen certe Lingua Latina superlativi saepius adhibentur quam Anglica. Quod attinet ad redere, "mea culpa" ut Anglice dicimus. Nam Usor:Adam_Episcopus:Adam Episcopus scripserat reddire et ego fortasse studio nimium corrigebam! --Iustinus 12:19 aug 26, 2004 (UTC)

Dictionarium meum "reddere" habet - sed verbo "transferre" uti possumus? (Ut Anglice, "translate".) Adam Episcopus 16:01 aug 26, 2004 (UTC)

Both will do, though both can mean a lot of other things too, depending on context. Frankly I would just leave it as it is for now. --Iustinus 18:16 aug 26, 2004 (UTC)

CalRis25 11:06 nov 1, 2004 (UTC) (CalRis): I wanted to vote PRO Nickshanks and wrote some corresponding notes. But even though I was logged in properly and CalRis25 appeared instead of 193.81.85.212 when previewing the page, my usr-name was converted to the 193.81.85.212 when I hit the Servare-button. Any idea why that has happened? Bye, CalRis

Voting period[fontem recensere]

I think, since we are a small Wikipedia, we should have more time for the voting. What about 14 days? --Rolandus 21:53, 29 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grapheocrates[fontem recensere]

I contacted Adam nudius tertius, asking if he would be available to op Andrew should he win the election. With only a few hours to go, it seems unlikely that nine users will pop out of the woodwork to vote against him, but Adam never answered me. Crud. Do we have any other grapheocratae besides Adam? Cause if not, we'll be stuck. --Iustinus 18:56, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not worry. Adam was active very recently, but if he should be away for a longer period of time, we can always put forward our request to a steward at meta:Requests for permissions. --UV 19:27, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity, why do we not have an active grapheocrates?--Ioshus ^(disp) 23:22, 4 Februarii 2007 (UTC)[reply]