Disputatio Usoris:Andrew Dalby/Tabularium 3

Etymologia commentationis "religionis"[fontem recensere]

Salve. :) Demiro de textu in parte "etymologia" in commentatione "religio" removebas. Est pars ceteri textus et ad rem conexe. -- Donatello (disputatio) 21:12, 5 Decembris 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Da veniam, mi Donatello. Volui in paginam disputationis rationem scribere, sed oblitus sum. Nunc ibi respondeo. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:47, 6 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ensis luminaris[fontem recensere]

Salve Andreas. Si placet libenter dice quod putatur tibi in disputatione de "ense luminari". -- Donatello (disputatio) 00:24, 10 Decembris 2013 (UTC).[reply]

100000[fontem recensere]

Dear Andrew there's some old category because I'm introducing some pages I prepared a lot of time ago. I believe it will be difficult without you to reach the target before Christmas. In any case let us see who will do this page. I wish you a Merry Christmas and an Happy New Year--Helveticus montanus (disputatio) 14:56, 13 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Massimo. I always enjoy looking at your new pages! Merry Christmas to you too -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:01, 13 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

VisualEditor[fontem recensere]

Hi Andrew,

I noticed that you'been using VisualEditor here. Is it working okay for Latin? Are there any problems that I should tell the devs about before they make it available to everyone in mid-January? I'd really like to know what you think of it—anything at all. Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF) (disputatio) 17:38, 17 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gratias tibi[fontem recensere]

Gratias ago dono. :) -- Donatello (disputatio) 18:17, 21 Decembris 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Ego quoque tibi gratias ago: valde gaudeo tantas bonas paginas videre! A. Mahoney (disputatio) 19:56, 23 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ex me etiam gratias tibi ago. Praemio accepto exhortatus sum operibus et latinam discenti.Jondel (disputatio) 12:34, 24 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Kalašnikov[fontem recensere]

Salve. Removere oportetne "š" in postnomine russico "Kalašnikov" in nomine commentationis? -- Donatello (disputatio) 18:02, 23 Decembris 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Ita, de titulo loquimur, non de textu.

Regula generalis nostra praecepit litteram "š" removendam, sed mea sententia nomina Cyrillica facilius leguntur si signa diacritica retinemus! Igitur fortasse regulam nostram oportet mutare ... Melius erit hanc rem cum Alexandro disputare. Sine dubio, si "š" retinemus, oportet redirectionem a "Kalasnikov" addere. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:17, 23 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Si ita, scribi oportetne "sh" tum "š" sono sh stat? -- Donatello (disputatio) 18:06, 23 Decembris 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Pro certo non, quia litterae sh lectoribus Latinis eum sonum non faciunt. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:17, 23 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opinione mea, si signa diacritica hic habemus in nominibus, qui sunt e linguis scriptura latina utentibus (ut Velázquez, Bülow, Čapek), etiam non removenda sunt e translitteratione nominum (ut Kalašnikov), si signis illis utitur. -- Alexander Geraščenko (disputatio) 18:44, 23 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fortasse oportet regulam nostram recensere. Olim, quando id statuimus, difficile erat verba diacriticis munitis per capsam quaestionis reperire: nunc autem facile est. Haec res praesertim interest nomina Cyrillice, Sanscritice, Arabice et fortassse Hebraice scripta: pro illis abecedariis exstat translitteratio internationalis diacriticis munita. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:59, 23 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tibi gratias ago[fontem recensere]

Vale, carissime Andreas, quomodo te habes?

I saw only now my Latin page, and I waould like to thank you for the prize. Thanks a lot, and Happy New year!

Rei Momo (disputatio) 01:10, 27 Decembris 2013 (UTC)[reply]

VisualEditor user interface translations[fontem recensere]

Salve Andrew,

I know you're busy, but could you look over the phrases here for translation? The Latin Wikipedia's user interface (e.g., the words the go on the software buttons) is only 2% complete, with 11 days until it's turned on for all editors here. I've got an account there, so if there's anything easy—presumably "beta" translates as "beta"? And should "VisualEditor" remain that, since Vicipaedia:VisualEditor is the name of the page? —I'd be happy to do some copy-and-paste work to move things along. Can you help me out, or suggest someone who could? Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF) (disputatio) 22:12, 2 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Andrew, thanks a lot for today's work on interface translation at translatewiki.net! I made a few changes, including changing the capitalization of "Editor Visualis" to "[E|e]ditor visualis". Please take a look at my changes at [1] and change back any of my edits you dislike! Greetings, --UV (disputatio) 22:00, 4 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfamiliar as yet with the interface, I was just working through some text very quickly in the confidence that others would come after ... so thanks, UV, for looking over this material. Yes, I'll have another go later today! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:36, 5 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You two are awesome! Thank you so much! Whatamidoing (WMF) (disputatio) 01:34, 7 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The latest word is "we've done our part, and we're waiting for them to do their part". Nobody is willing to speculate on how much longer it will be. Whatamidoing (WMF) (disputatio) 01:03, 23 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the new links:

This one, which is bold/italics/insert, that kind of thing, and
That one, which has just four short messages.

I don't know why these ended up in separate lists.

If you want to check for the possibility of even more separate lists, then I think that this link will take you there, but you'll have to click "Expand all" (near the upper right corner). If you see any more stray English floating around your user interface, then please let me know. It ought to be possible to translate every single jot and tittle. Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF) (disputatio) 23:24, 25 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Psychotherapista and botanista[fontem recensere]

Dear Andrew, I would appreciate your input on disputatio categoriae: psychotherapistae and disputatio: nomina botanistarum vernacula. Thank you very much, with kind regards, Wimpus (disputatio) 23:42, 6 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: VisualEditor special character inserter[fontem recensere]

Hi Andrew,

I just wanted to thank you for all the work you’ve been doing with VisualEditor and ask if you would be willing to help out with a specific feedback request. The developers are working towards offering mw:VisualEditor to all users at about 50 Wikipedias that require characters that don't appear on most people's keyboards. Naturally, when they said the most useful testers were probably "people who speak multiple languages", I thought of you.

Since you've already got VisualEditor enabled, all you need to do is try out the special character inserter and tell the developers what you think. "Special character" is found under "Insert", at the bottom. You can leave your comments and the language(s) you tested it in at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback or at the feedback thread on Mediawiki.org. The tool is very basic, and they want to hear people's views before they go further. Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF) (disputatio) 01:05, 23 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Up to now I had only been working in VisualEditor in Latin and English, so I hadn't even tried the character insert feature. I'll try it. "Speak multiple languages" may be an exaggeration in my case, but I certainly have a go at writing multiple languages on Wikipedia :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:48, 23 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be interested in hearing what you think. What we have at the moment is obviously just a "baby step" in the right direction. One question to think about is how you'd like to get access to everything—because all the special characters that someone might need in writing (e.g., about "foreign" literature) won't fit on the screen at the same time. Whatamidoing (WMF) (disputatio) 23:19, 25 Ianuarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Parlamentum Europaeum[fontem recensere]

Salve Andreas. Fortasse adiuvare potes in disputatione "Nomen commentationis et aedificii" commentationis "Parlamenti Europaei". -- Donatello (disputatio) 04:38, 8 Februarii 2014 (UTC).[reply]

De nominibus Latine vertendis[fontem recensere]

Salve, Andrea! Nescio an recte intellexerim et iudicarim de Deversorio et turri internationali Trump et de Platea ad Scalas (et de aliis talibus, quae fieri videntur). Mihi quidem videtur nullum privilegium nobis esse talia nomina Latine vertendi, cum aliae vicipaediae nomine authentico utantur. Sed forsitan errem. Estne vero moris nostri ita facere? Neander (disputatio) 17:30, 9 Februarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De eisdem nominibus dubitavi et ego. Ergo iuxta illas paginas sententiam meam exprimere conabor :) Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:16, 9 Februarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Francus Trappoli[fontem recensere]

Vale, carissime Andrew, quomodo te habes?

Haec pagina creavi et tibi peto prvam relecturam, parvum labor erit! Tibi grazias ago.

Rei Momo (disputatio) 11:54, 12 Februarii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paginae novae tuae ...[fontem recensere]

Vale, Andrew. Gratis tibi ago pro confirmatione et notatione. Non solum pro lectorum utilitate sed etiam pro inspiciendi facilitate notas subiunctas scribo. --Maria.martelli (disputatio) 18:03, 3 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recte dicis, Maria, et utilitatem talium adnotationum non disputo. Optime! Rursus gratias tibi ago propter paginas novas. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:49, 3 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Check this[fontem recensere]

This looks like it should be at least partly reverted, but I don't know whether the new text should be kept. Would you take a look when you have a minute? Thanks, WhatamIdoing (disputatio) 23:55, 7 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very useful. I reverted, but left a note for the editor, who probably just needs to know more about contributing to a wiki. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:24, 8 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Luigi latine[fontem recensere]

Salve Andreas. Fortasse adiuvare potes in disputatione Luigi in Latin. -- Donatello (disputatio) 03:29, 11 Martii 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Categoriae celatae[fontem recensere]

Ave!

Briefly, I hid a lot of categories, including that one, because I noticed that in the en:wp that type of category has been hidden everwhere (see these three pages). I didn't know that Latin Wikipedia has completely different rules from the other ones, but no problems with your revision&correction: I'll do as you told me!

Thank you for your usual exactitude and nicety, Franciesse 18:57, 16 Martii 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Universitas Complutensis Matritensis[fontem recensere]

Salve Andrew:

Disculpa que te escriba en español, pero mi dominio del latín es escaso. La Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Universitas Complutensis Matritensis) no está localizada en Alcalá de Henares (Complutum) sino en la ciudad de Madrid (Matritum). Por eso la cambié de categoría. En la actualidad la Universidad de Alcalá es la que se localiza en Alcalá de Henares. Y la histórica Universidad Complutense se localizó en Alcalá de Henares hasta 1836. Por favor, vuelve a cambiar las categorías. Vale. --Raimundo Pastor (disputatio) 20:02, 18 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao[fontem recensere]

Ma tu credi che io mi stia divertendo a cambiare i nomi... guarda anche tu su Hazlitt! O forse sei totalmente ignorante Sacreum (disputatio) 13:30, 19 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De qua re loqueris nescio, sed in pagina tua respondeo! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:32, 19 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sacreum[fontem recensere]

Dear Andrew, how are you? I'm fine but I'm very busy with my work (not with vicipaedia but with the real one :-)

As you have asked me, I have done and already added the following translation:

L'ho bloccata perché Lei stava inserendo una serie di modifiche sistematiche senza previa discussione. I nomi da Lei mutati erano in sanscrito, non in latino, e non vi è quindi nmotivo di cambiare la translitterazione internazionale in uso per il sanscrito. Desidero aggiungere che ci si deve rivolgere educatamente agli altri wikipediani, in particolare quando Lei desidera apportare cambiamenti a quanto già da loro fatto. Ho letto la Sua pagina di discussione e ho notato molti commenti di altri wikipediani senza alcuna replica da parte Sua. Se Lei desidera continuare a lavorare con noi, dovrà dialogare con gli altri. Se Lei non seguisse questo consiglio, potremmo imporLe un blocco di durata maggiore-- non vorrei farlo, perché Lei ha fatto un lavoro davvero utile per quanto riguarda le pagine geografiche sull'Italia

Ciao --Helveticus montanus (disputatio) 21:19, 26 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you been elected? I hope soo--Helveticus montanus (disputatio) 04:30, 31 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Massimo -- it was rather easy! 11 candidates, 11 places. Here's the proof. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:56, 31 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ad Eadmerum (et alia)[fontem recensere]

De hoc syllogismo age fac ut tibi placet. Verba eius sola memoria nisus attraxi sine testimonio certo. Inveneram olim varios locos in interrete hanc dictionem continentes.

Ceterum: Perlectis a te missis cupivi nonnullas locutiones Latinas contemplari. Et legens ab ovo haesivi. Nam secundum verba Horatii (v. 147) haec locutio mihi videtur non ad ovum ad cenam paratum, sed ad ovum quoddam pertinere geminum, sc. illud a Leda partum, e quo Helena et Polydeuces erepserunt. Quae cum ita essent, Horatius Homerum laudat, quia bellum Troianum non a partu Helenae incipiens narrat (vel, ut theodisce dici solet nicht mit Adam und Eva beginnt). Quid tibi videtur? - Bavarese (disputatio) 17:43, 28 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pro certo, mi Bavarese, ibi erravi: verbum "geminum" id sine ullo dubio demonstrat. Tibi gratias multas ago.

Sed versus in verbis "ab ovo" terminat. Nonne Horatius eodem tempore ad locutionem "ab ovo usque ad mala" advertit? Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:16, 29 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Id mihi non liquet. Immo Horatius mihi ad sequentia verba ad eventum et in medias res (NB istud in fine versus inusitatissimum unius syllabae verbum!) festinare videtur.

Ceterum, si ad hanc aliasque locutiones Latinas legere vis, quae ego scribenda esse existimaveram, videas in Wikipedia linguae theodiscae Lateinische Phrasen.

Rursus gratias ago! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:39, 31 Martii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salve[fontem recensere]

Accumsan Integer condimentum, gratias: Cristo de La Laguna, Real Santuario del Santísimo Cristo de La Laguna. Aliquam bene vertere nomina.--81.35.203.65 18:09, 8 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recte an nomen latine?: Maria de León Bello y Delgado.--81.35.206.111 11:57, 9 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Christus ad Lacunam Maris[fontem recensere]

Optime egisti, mi Dalby.--Viator (disputatio) 21:53, 9 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changes[fontem recensere]

Salve Andrew,

We're rearranging support for VisualEditor a bit, which means that I won't be dropping by the Latin Wikipedia nearly as often to see how it's working, to check for questions, or to let you know about m:IRC office hours. Would you please let me know if any problems or questions come up? You know how to find me at the English Wikipedia, and the central feedback page is at mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.

Also, if you want to keep up with VisualEditor's development, we're starting a newsletter list at m:VisualEditor/Newsletter for anyone who wants to hear about bug fixes and new features. Upcoming (we hope!) features include support for using both left-to-right and right-to-left text in the same line, and an improved, simplified citation tool (depends on citation templates, so it must be configured by a local admin).

Thanks for your help and dedication to this project. I really do appreciate it. Whatamidoing (WMF) (disputatio) 00:12, 30 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thermae Gallo-Romanae Inter Amnium[fontem recensere]

Vale, carissime Andreas, quomodo te habes?

Haec nova pagine feci, et tibi parvam relecturam peto. Please, I've some trouble with my PC, I'm not hable this morning to put the page on Wikidata. Please, I ask you the precious help to make it for me, you can see the French page.

Thanks a lot for your help!

Rei Momo (disputatio) 08:51, 30 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done! You caught me at just the right moment, while the morning coffee was still too hot to drink. Vale optime, Rex! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 08:54, 30 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tuam opinionem peto[fontem recensere]

Carissime Andreas, quomodo te habes?

Tibi peto opinionem: novam paginam creare volo, sed quomodo nominare nescio: vel Nise sed Nisa. Ad paginam Maceium ier potes et deinde mihi opinionem tuam dare.

Nome istae medicae, Lusitanice, Nise da Silveira est; sed melior est Nisa da Silveira scribere?

Tibi magnam gratias ago!

Rei Momo (disputatio) 08:26, 16 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De praenomine "Nise" recte censuisti, Rei Momo, quia praenomen Latinum "Nisa" non habemus. Igitur "Nise" retinendum est. De "Alacunae" et "Categoria:Urbes Alacunae" dubito. Si "Alacunae" recte appellavimus, categoria erit "Urbes Alacunarum" ... sed ne moveamus antequam fontem nominis "Alacunae" reppererimus! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:28, 16 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tibi gratias ago, sed cum tibi 5 minutos adsunt, mihi grata erit relecturam paginae medicae Nise da Silveira. Vale oprime! Rei Momo (disputatio) 14:36, 16 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctus Dionysius[fontem recensere]

It's a pleasure to work together for vicipaedia. Have you been elected?, I hope you have. Ciao Max

Tuam opinionem peto[fontem recensere]

Carissime Andreas, quomodo te habes?

Tibi peto opinionem: novam paginam creare volo, a pagina anglica Bonda. In pagina Orissa scribere volo:

In haec civitate parvum populum Bondae vivit.

Tibi peto si haec linea iusta est. Tibi grazias ago.

Rei Momo (disputatio) 09:09, 28 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andrew, as Nise da Silveira, I asked your opinion about this new page I would like to open, but I didn't yet have aswer. Please, when you have 2 minutes, cold you answer me? Have a nice day! Rei Momo (disputatio) 08:04, 2 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tibi magnas gratias ago, et dico hodie vel cras haec pagina creo. Rei Momo (disputatio) 14:38, 2 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gratia tibi dabo[fontem recensere]

propter emendationes paginae Bernardo Kuchner dicatae. Etiam fecit paginam Michaelae Alliot-Marie dicataHelveticus montanus (disputatio) 09:12, 29 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

de pagina prima emendanda[fontem recensere]

Salve Andrew, pro magno conlationum tuarum numero certe scies, utrum propositiones paginae primae emendandae aliquando legantur an eas in vento et rapida scribere oporteat aqua. --Laurentianus (disputatio) 00:01, 4 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salve et tu, Laurentiane. Ubique apud nos, quando errores aut rei aut Latinitatis vides, corrige si potes. Si quis postea disputare vult, potest. An recte dubia tua intellegi?

Rem fortasse utilem addo. Nuntios, quos in pagina prima vides, optime emendabis hoc modo: primum in pagina Formula:Nuntii; postea in Vicipaedia:Pagina prima/Nuntii. Cito factum est: potes enim textum emendatum copiare et pastare (!) Id dico quia res in Formulam "Nuntii" inscriptae ad aeternitatem manent, sed Vicipaedia:Pagina prima/Nuntii saepe renovatur, nuntiis veterioribus deletis. Da veniam: hanc rem iam bene scis! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:44, 4 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gratias tibi habeo, Andrew. Bene est. Id tantum mihi dubium est, qua machinatione pagina prima ipsa sit mutanda. Cuius enim fontem cum recensere volo, haec verba leguntur: "Tibi non licet hanc paginam recensere, ex ratione: Haec pagina protecta est, ut emendationes prohibeantur." Quo nihil verius!

Quantum intellegi, emendationes proponere quidem licet. Igitur, ne primo cuique Vicipaediam Latinam inspicienti fastidium fiat, vitium quoddam maxime horribile lectu emendandum proposui (ut supra). Num aliquando observatum erit? --Laurentianus (disputatio) 15:17, 4 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A, male intellegi! Ratio protectionis paginae primae (sicut apud alias Vicipaedias) fortasse scis: mutationes tam vandalorum quam Latinistarum statim a multis videntur. Magistratus sum: emendationes igitur, quas facere voluisti, nunc facio. Potes alias suadere, si necesse sit, in Vicipaedia:Taberna. Vale optime -- Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 18:35, 4 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ita factum iri speravi, quamvis nescius honoris tui. Gratulor certe et gratias tibi ago maximas et pro tua in desiderium meum opera et quod me ad tabernam delegasti. Bene vale! --Laurentianus (disputatio) 23:52, 4 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salvē. De 史記 loquor[fontem recensere]

Grātiās tibi agō prō explicātiōnem nōrmae Vicipaediae dē titulīs orīginālibus tractantis. Mīror īnsuper vōs titulō orīginālī ūsōs esse, etiam cum characteribus Sīnicīs scrībantur! Ūsor enim novus sum et deinde nesciēbam.--Serafín33 (disputatio) 16:30, 10 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expeditus[fontem recensere]

Hi, how are you? I would like to remove the fertur fuisse and replace with fuit. Can we then remove the latinatis? Thanks.--Jondel (disputatio) 09:42, 25 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Er, no. "Fertur fuisse" is as near to honesty as we can get. So that I don't lose it, the "historical" source is here (top left, col. 1 twice, col. 2 once). I don't believe Delehaye's commentary is available on line. I'll see if I can save the page: the trouble is that the English page is very weak on sourcing, even about the ways in which "Expeditus" is now commemorated. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:50, 25 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania Barbicanus[fontem recensere]

Salve Andrew, I wonder if there would be any chance of bringing UK Latin editors together at Wikimania? We have lots of tables and spaces over the three days, we can even create a specail banner for you, and it could be fun? If you are interested get in touch with me jon.davies@wikimedia.org.uk Jon Davies (WMUK) (disputatio) 14:31, 25 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there are two in the UK who are occasionally active, and just a few formerly active :) In total, that's not many! Beyond the UK, well, I'm in France, and there are several others, very active, in Europe. I'll put this on the Vicipaedia:Taberna to see if anyone is interested in making the trip to London (8-10 August)! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:12, 25 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Travelling[fontem recensere]

I am away from home until 23 July. It will be better to ask others for help over this period, because I will not be able to log in often. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 14:27, 10 Iulii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bon voyage!--Jondel (disputatio) 05:07, 11 Iulii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

have a nice holidayHelveticus montanus (disputatio) 14:33, 14 Iulii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

De Agathocle ignoto[fontem recensere]

Salve,

profecto ille scriptor nimis ignotus obscurusque videtur. Ego cum interrete diligenter perscrutatus essem notionem tantum inveni eum in quodam indice Theodisco denotatum esse. (Paul Kroh: Lexikon der Antiken Autoren. Stuttgart 1972, S. 10) Remne fide dignam esse censere non possum. Videris recte admonuisse hanc paginam deleri nisi quis forte hunc librum inspecturus fontem confirmat. --Autokrator (disputatio) 22:31, 15 Iulii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interdum egomet ipse fontem alium repperi remque confirmavi, mi Autokrator! Fontem addere conabor, sed in mundo ipadarum haud facile est. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 07:24, 16 Iulii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Categoria Composita inorganica[fontem recensere]

Dear Andrew, welcome back! IacobusAmor and I were discussing the name of categoria Composita inorganica. And IacobusAmor rightfully suggested that your input was much needed. In case your interested and have time, could you join the discussion? Thank you very much, with kind regards, Wimpus (disputatio) 14:02, 24 Iulii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome home[fontem recensere]

Welcome "home", dear Andrew, how are you after your holidays? CiaoHelveticus montanus (disputatio) 18:51, 24 Iulii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Palaeographica[fontem recensere]

Ave, mi Andrea!

Si placet, vide hanc disputationem palaeographicam.
Cura ut valeas. --Alexander De Jasminis (disputatio) 19:30, 25 Iulii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LS wiki[fontem recensere]

ciao, non scrivo molto bene l'inglese neanche scrivo bene il latino sono ad un livello 2, ma ti scrivo in italiano; dunque, sono io il creatore delle voci sulle lingue dei segni.. che cosa non vanno bene nelle voci interessate?? --SurdusVII (LIS) 10:05, 1 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a big problem! I will reply on your user page. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:39, 1 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello, then I answer briefly because at sttistico is a bit complicated for the example of Switzerland...

Switzerland actually deaf people are a lot more but they use more than 3 sign languages: Italian, French and German..

while that for the most trusted source would be this... ^_^ --SurdusVII (LIS) 12:16, 1 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

salve, etiam si in aliis numeris noris, id est multitudinem statistics Aliquam surdi sunt hic, hic et hic... --SurdusVII (LIS) 13:33, 3 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Philippus Franciscus von Siebold[fontem recensere]

Salve Andrew, how are you?>Could< I ask, did you originaly want to put nunctiones or nuncipationes or nuntiones in the article? Thanks in advance.--Jondel (disputatio) 08:19, 11 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my page, Jondel: I just added a category, I think. That sentence puzzled me, but I didn't have time to work out what it meant and how to say it better. Sorry. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 09:04, 11 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Let me look at/refer to the English wiki and change to an appropriate word, maybe articles (res? ) or information (nuntios).Jondel (disputatio) 09:11, 11 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gratiae[fontem recensere]

Gratias, Andrea, habeo tibi maximas, quod importunitati molestissimae finem imposuisti. Moderamina tua semper gratissima. Laurentianus (disputatio) 10:08, 22 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tabula aedificiorum historicorum in Provincia Ispahanum[fontem recensere]

Hi Andrew. I have a very poor knowledge of latin language. Would you help me! What are the translations of these items in Latin?

Decorative arts museum of Isfahan
Contemporary arts Museum of Isfahan
Natural history museum of Isfahan

Thank you for your help. Diako ^{« Disputatio »} 12:33, 24 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not so easy, because we have not yet fixed on the best modern Latin name to use for this city! I think you can choose between the adjectives "Ispahanensis" and "Isfahanensis", both of which are used in modern and scientific Latin. I will suggest "Isfahanensis" because it is closer to modern names in other languages. "Museum" is a neuter word, so the neuter adjective form will be "Isfahanense". Here goes then:

Decorative arts museum of Isfahan Museum Artium Ornationis Isfahanense
Contemporary arts Museum of Isfahan Museum Artium Hodiernarum Isfahanense
Natural history museum of Isfahan Museum Historiae Naturalis Isfahanense

Other Vicipaedians may well show up here and suggest improvements ... Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 15:09, 24 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ta for the cue. Ornatio has the disadvantage of being "not ante-Aug., and very rare" (L&S). Whatever word is best will probably be found in the Latin lemma to be chosen to accommodate the lemma of the English article en:Decorative arts. IacobusAmor (disputatio) 15:39, 24 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, of course, Iacobe -- unluckily we don't have that article yet (maybe you're about to write it?) For the present, I couldn't find anything better than ornatio. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 16:17, 24 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Andrew. I've finished writing of the article (list) Tabula aedificiorum historicorum in Provincia Ispahanum. Would you please take a look at it and correct possible mistakes. Thank you very much for your help. Diako ^{« Disputatio »} 15:48, 27 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arx Guged et Bazar Isfahanensis[fontem recensere]

Hi Andrew. Would you please take a look at these stub articles Arx Guged and Bazar Isfahanensis. Diako ^{« Disputatio »} 16:36, 28 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

meta:User:Andrew Dalby/global.js will be loaded automatically (no need to "mw.loader.load" meta:User:Andrew Dalby/global.js any more from common.js)[fontem recensere]

Hello, it was announced that from August 26 on, global.js scripts will be automatically loaded from meta. The line:

mw.loader.load('//meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Andrew_Dalby/global.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');

should be removed from all of your Special:Mypage/common.js pages (on all Wikimedia projects) in order to avoid that your meta:User:Andrew Dalby/global.js is being loaded twice (once by the new mechanism and once by the old mw.loader.load function call). You may wish to sign up at meta:GlobalCssJs#Removing manually created local pages in order to have most of your now-unnecessary common.js files (e. g. wa:Special:Mypage/common.js) deleted automatically. Greetings, --UV (disputatio) 22:36, 22 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, aside from your la:Usor:Andrew Dalby/common.js (which you already fixed yourself) the script did not touch the following scripts - you may wish to blank those yourself.

bg:Потребител:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
de:Benutzer:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
el:Χρήστης:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
en:User:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
es:Usuario:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
fr:Utilisateur:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
it:Utente:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
mk:Корисник:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
pt:Usuário(a):Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
ru:Участник:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
tr:Kullanıcı:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.
wikidata:User:Andrew Dalby/common.js has more than one revision, skipping.

Greetings, --UV (disputatio) 00:14, 30 Augusti 2014 (UTC)[reply]