Disputatio:Universitas Sancti Thomae Manilana

Nomen[fontem recensere]

An possumus Universitas Sancti Thomae Manilana? Tomae est error orthographicus; sine Manilana habemus fortasse problema discretivum. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 11:43, 3 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In car sticker 'Universitas Sancti Tomae' me visus est hic. (I saw 'Universitas Sancti Tomae' in a car sticker here). Non certum sum apud Manilana. Nonne recte est Manila?--Jondel 00:32, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another possible name:Santus Thomae Aquinatis Universitas Manilana from the web.--Jondel 02:20, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think I saw that webpage too (but correctly it has to be Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Universitas Manilana). That's maybe a good form to use. Manilanus/-a is certainly well-attested as the Latin adjective for Manila. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:28, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rei futuro, potius est habere optiones et haec disputationes. (For the future it would be good to have options and these discussions).--Jondel 12:07, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Universitas Sancti Thomae Manilana movendam accordo. Facimusne?--Jondel 12:12, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Gratias! Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:29, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas->Tomae[fontem recensere]

Fortasse, 'Tomae' potius est, quam de origo 'Te'oma', aramaice, quod significat gemellus.--Jondel 00:40, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with you there. We are doing Latin, not Aramaic. Anyway, it seems the University is named after Thomas Aquinas, and he certainly wrote good Latin and spelt his name Thomas. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 10:28, 4 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Its worth mentioning the roots anyway. I saw the new advent vulgate bible page and they use Tomas there.--Jondel 12:04, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 12:39, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OOOPS !!!I meant: they use Thomas there.--Jondel 12:49, 6 Decembris 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imagines[fontem recensere]