Disputatio:Spiritualitas
Lemma[fontem recensere]
Cassell's: "spirituality, animus rerum divinarum studiosus." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:01, 23 Maii 2013 (UTC)
Definitio[fontem recensere]
Generally, definitions that start by saying that something is the name of something are weak, in part because we ordinarily define things, not their names, and in part because authors usually forget to mark the name by italicizing or quoting it. E.g.:
- Mr. Ed est equus. = OK.
- Mr. Ed est nomen equi. = OK (but usually weak).
- "Mr. Ed" est nomen equi. = OK (but usually weak).
- Mr. Ed est nomen equi. = Not OK !
Compare the current definition: "Spiritualitas . . . est nomen ad altum sapientem modum esse." IacobusAmor (disputatio) 20:12, 23 Maii 2013 (UTC)
Prima sententia[fontem recensere]
Primam sententiam restitui quia intellegi potuit: versionem ultimam non intellegibilem censui. Continuationem non perlegi :)Andrew Dalby (disputatio) 17:19, 24 Aprilis 2014 (UTC)