Disputatio:Oeconomica Keynesiana

placit.a             VPAR   2 1 NOM S F PERF PASSIVE PPL
placit.a             VPAR   2 1 VOC S F PERF PASSIVE PPL
placit.a             VPAR   2 1 ABL S F PERF PASSIVE PPL
placit.a             VPAR   2 1 NOM P N PERF PASSIVE PPL
placit.a             VPAR   2 1 VOC P N PERF PASSIVE PPL
placit.a             VPAR   2 1 ACC P N PERF PASSIVE PPL
placeo, placere, placui, placitus  V  DAT   [XXXAX]  
please, satisfy, give pleasure to (with dat.);
placet, placere, -, placitus est  V  IMPERS   [XXXCX]  
it is pleasing/satisfying, gives pleasure; is believed/settled/agreed/decided;
placit.a             N      2 2 NOM P N                 
placit.a             N      2 2 VOC P N                 
placit.a             N      2 2 ACC P N                 
placitum, placiti  N  N   [FLXFJ]    Medieval  veryrare
plea;
placit.a             ADJ    1 1 NOM S F POS             
placit.a             ADJ    1 1 VOC S F POS             
placit.a             ADJ    1 1 ABL S F POS             
placit.a             ADJ    1 1 NOM P N POS             
placit.a             ADJ    1 1 VOC P N POS             
placit.a             ADJ    1 1 ACC P N POS             
placitus, placita, placitum  ADJ   [XPXDS]    lesser
pleasing; agreed upon;
placit.a             V      1 1 PRES ACTIVE  IMP 2 S    
placito, placitare, placitavi, placitatus  V   [FLXFJ]    Medieval  veryrare
plead;

Which one are we going with here? Why not theoria? Or oeconomia? Or theoria oeconomica?--Ioshus ^(disp) 14:21, 15 Novembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

placitum, placita[fontem recensere]

I am following Vox Latina which coined the term (thirty years ago) "placita Marxiana" videlicet for Marxism. In Stowasser I find at second place first "opinion", then Lehrmeinungen, Lehren with reference to Tacitus, which is similar to doctrine, theory. Similarly Langenscheidt placitum = doctrine (among other meanings). See also wikt:placitum. So in my view the term seems to be possible if of course only one among others. Alex1011 19:45, 15 Novembris 2006 (UTC)[reply]

De syntaxi[fontem recensere]

Placita Keynesiana (sicut etiam placita Marxiana) non videtur dictio bona esse, nam placita poscunt, ut nomen attributum in genetivo subiectivo ponatur: placita Catonis, philosophiae, etc ac placita maiorum, veterum auctorum, philosophorum, Babyloniorum, Stoicorum etc. Itaque oporteat dicere placita Keynesii ('quid dixerit Keynes') aut placita Keynesianorum ('quid dixerint assectatores Keynesii'). Neander (disputatio) 11:55, 17 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aut Keynes, indecl. Sed quid dicite de oeconomica Keynesiana? Lesgles (disputatio) 18:26, 17 Maii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oeconomica Keynesiana mihi valde placet, o Lesgles. At equidem Keynesium non declinare arduum et incommodum esse in praxi putarim. Praeterea, si indeclinabile sit, non est, cur liceat "declinatione voluntaria" utentibus Keynesianum dicere. ¶ In textu usque ad hunc diem oeconomologus scriptum est, quod certe grammatice dicitur, sed quia ne Graeci quidem de oeconomologia loquuntur, equidem oeconomicum praetulerim. Neander (disputatio) 16:20, 14 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Optime! Lesgles (disputatio) 17:28, 14 Iunii 2014 (UTC)[reply]