Disputatio:4chan
Semi-protecta[fontem recensere]
This is 4chan we're talking about.... wouldn't it be a good idea to semi-protect this page? --Robert.Baruch 01:57, 6 Martii 2010 (UTC)
- Why should we? As far as I can read through the vague Latin and the obscure terminology, it is just a website. --Xaverius 11:10, 6 Martii 2010 (UTC)
- It's true that the English Wikipedia gets frequently vandalized by 4chan users, but most of the other wikipedias haven't protected the article either, so I'd rather wait with protecting until this page gets vandalized for the first time, to give IPs and new users a chance to contribute constructivly. --Aylin 11:50, 6 Martii 2010 (UTC)
- OK. I just sort of imagined Anonymous descending upon the page and pig-Latinizing it or something. --Robert.Baruch 00:32, 7 Martii 2010 (UTC)
- It's true that the English Wikipedia gets frequently vandalized by 4chan users, but most of the other wikipedias haven't protected the article either, so I'd rather wait with protecting until this page gets vandalized for the first time, to give IPs and new users a chance to contribute constructivly. --Aylin 11:50, 6 Martii 2010 (UTC)